Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen-Wishart, Mindyen_NZ
dc.date.available2012-12-14T04:49:08Z
dc.date.copyright1987en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationChen-Wishart, M. (1987). Unconscionable bargains : what are the courts doing? (Thesis, Master of Laws). University of Otago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/3335en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/3335
dc.description152 leaves :fold. map ; 30 cm. Includes bibliography. University of Otago department: Law.en_NZ
dc.description.tableofcontentsI. Unconscionability : Unity in Diversity? A. Judicial explanations of unconscionability B. The fact pattern of unconscionability C. The burden of proof? D. Where to now? II. Procedural rationales for the proposed burden of proof A. Protection of the weaker contracting party B. Defective consent C. Unconscientious/unreasonable reliance III. Judicial application of the elements of unconscionability A. Complainant disability B. Contractual imbalance C. Independent advice D. Knowledge of disability E. The quality of the enforcer’s conduct IV. Substantive unfairness A. Judicial explanation of the role of substantive unfairness B. The procedure-substance distinction : a Gordian knot C. The primacy of substantive concerns V. Conclusion
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherUniversity of Otagoen_NZ
dc.rightsAll items in OUR Archive are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.en_NZ
dc.titleUnconscionable bargains : what are the courts doing?en_NZ
dc.typeThesisen_NZ
thesis.degree.disciplineLawen_NZ
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Lawsen_NZ
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Otagoen_NZ
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_NZ
otago.interloanyesen_NZ
otago.openaccessOpen
dc.identifier.voyager79822en_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record