Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKing, M.R.
dc.contributor.authorWensley, D.
dc.date.available2010-07-27T02:56:13Z
dc.date.copyright2008
dc.identifier.citationKing, M. R., & Wensley, D. (2008). Scientific responsibility for the dissemination and interpretation of genetic research: Lessons from the ‘Warrior Gene’ controversy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 507–509. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019596en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/361
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the announcement by a team of researchers that they identified a genetic influence for a range of ‘antisocial’ behaviours in the New Zealand Māori population (dubbed the ‘Warrior Gene’). The behaviours included criminality, violence, gambling, and alcoholism. The reported link between genetics and behaviour met with much controversy. The scientists were described as hiding behind a veneer of supposedly ‘objective’ western science, using it to perpetuate ‘racist and oppressive discourses’. In this paper we examine what went wrong in the dissemination of the research. We chose as our framework the debate around the ‘internal / external’ responsibilities of scientists. Using this discourse we argue that when the researchers ventured to explain their research in terms of social phenomena, they assumed a duty to ensure that their findings were placed ‘in context’. By ‘in context’, we argue that evidence of any genetic influence on behavioural characteristics should not be reported in isolation, but instead presented alongside other environmental, cultural, and socio-economic influences that may also contribute to the studied behaviour. Rather than imposing a new obligation on scientists, we find this duty to contextualise results is in keeping with the spirit of codes of ethics already in place. Lessons from the ‘Warrior Gene’ controversy may assist researchers elsewhere to identify potential areas of conflict before they jeopardise research relationships, or disseminate findings in a manner that fuels misleading and / or potentially discriminatory attitudes in society.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherBMJ Publishingen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Medical Ethicsen_NZ
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/*
dc.titleScientific responsibility for the dissemination and interpretation of genetic research: Lessons from the ‘Warrior Gene’ controversyen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
otago.schoolBioethics Centreen_NZ
otago.relation.volume34en_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jme.2006.019596en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage509
otago.bitstream.startpage507
otago.openaccessOpen
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported