Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFletcher, David
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Jiaxu
dc.date.available2013-03-26T02:44:21Z
dc.date.copyright2013
dc.identifier.citationZeng, J. (2013). Model-Averaged Confidence Intervals (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). University of Otago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/3806en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/3806
dc.description.abstractModel averaging is commonly used to allow for model uncertainty in parameter estimation. In the frequentist setting, a model-averaged estimate of a parameter is a weighted mean of the estimates from the individual models, with the weights being based on an information criterion, such as AIC. A Wald confidence interval based on this estimate often performs poorly, as its sampling distribution is generally non-normal and estimation of the standard error is problematic. A natural alternative is to use a bootstrap approach. The current method is based on the percentile method, which bootstraps the estimate from the best model. Little previous research has been carried out to assess its coverage properties. These issues demonstrate the need for further development into the interval estimation when making multi-model inference. In this thesis, we propose a new method for constructing a model-averaged confidence interval using studentized bootstrap. We carry out simulations when the data are either normal or lognormal. Our results suggest that the studentized bootstrap interval provides the best coverage for approximately the same interval width as competing intervals in the lognormal setting. It is also shown to be the best approach for both normal and lognormal data when the sample size is small. Furthermore, we consider the use of model-averaging in the analysis of overdispersed count data. In a single-model setting, the default method for dealing with overdispersion is to either use a quasi-Poisson approach, or to fit the data using a negative binomial model. We examine the performance of the two methods in a model-averaging setting. Our results suggest that the quasi-Poisson approach leads to a better coverage rate, even when a negative binomial model is used to generate the data.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Otago
dc.rightsAll items in OUR Archive are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subjectModel-Averaging
dc.subjectBootstrapping
dc.subjectCoverage
dc.titleModel-Averaged Confidence Intervals
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.updated2013-03-26T00:25:08Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
thesis.degree.disciplineMathematics and Statistics
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Otago
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
otago.interloanno
otago.openaccessAbstract Only
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record