Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSvensson, Isak
dc.contributor.advisorClements, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorBobekova, Elvira
dc.date.available2013-10-22T23:21:16Z
dc.date.copyright2013
dc.identifier.citationBobekova, E. (2013). Rivers of Peace: Third Party Conflict Management of Transboundary River Disputes (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). University of Otago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/4347en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/4347
dc.description.abstractThere is a growing body of literature explaining agreements over international river disputes. However, beyond individual case analysis, no quantitative study has been undertaken on the role of third parties in settling river disputes in the regions of the world that are most vulnerable to global climate change. Moreover, there has been no study that combines quantitative and qualitative approaches and provides a systematic explanation within a single analytical framework. This study aims to fill these gaps by combining quantitative and qualitative methods, developing a novel theoretical framework called transcendency, and conducting the first large-n study examining the role of third parties in the emergence of river agreements in Asia and Africa during the time period 1948-2007. Through utilising new data on the role of third parties in river disputes, this study shows that third party involvement in the conflict management of river disputes increases the likelihood of reaching river agreements. Through a process tracing case studies of third party engagement in international river disputes in Central Asia, this study also identifies how and why third parties reach agreements. Drawing on the transcendency framework, I argue that third party actors facilitate riparian cooperation by addressing three transcendency problems: securitisation of river systems, legal ambiguity and credibility problems. River water has a superordinate value, therefore river issues are often perceived as zero-sum security issues. At the same time, however, river water also has utilitarian value due to its use in addressing the development and economic needs of states. One of the reasons why third parties are able to advance cooperation is because third parties can assist in the de-securitisation of the water issue and shift the focus towards the utilitarian aspects of river disputes. Secondly, third parties can address issues related to legal ambiguity and help to clarify the positions of riparian states from a normative perspective. Thirdly, where upstream/downstream relationships exist, third parties can assist in obtaining and providing the necessary information to address issues of information asymmetry and incentivise parties to commit to their agreements through promises of financial support. In addition to identifying the effect and outcome of third parties in riparian disputes, this study also explains why some riparian disputes attract third party assistance whereas others do not, although this is not the major focus of the study. The study demonstrates that a third party’s strategic interest in the resolution of a dispute as well as a riparian state’s openness to the international community, particularly a riparian state’s relationship to powerful Western states, will determine if riparian states are willing to engage third party assistance in managing riparian conflict. Given the current uncertainty around the security challenges of climate change and water stress, this research contributes to our understanding of how to respond to conflicts concerning transboundary waters.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Otago
dc.rightsAll items in OUR Archive are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subjectwater scarcity
dc.subjecttransboundary rivers
dc.subjectconflict management
dc.subjectthird parties
dc.subjectmediation
dc.subjectcentral asia
dc.subjectlarge-n study
dc.subjectriver disputes
dc.titleRivers of Peace: Third Party Conflict Management of Transboundary River Disputes
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.updated2013-10-22T22:19:46Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
thesis.degree.disciplineCentre for Peace and Conflict Studies
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Otago
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
otago.openaccessOpen
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record