Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Hugh
dc.contributor.authorLiepins, Ruth
dc.date.available2014-11-19T22:03:11Z
dc.date.copyright2001
dc.identifier.citationCampbell, H., & Liepins, R. (2001). Naming Organics: understanding organic standards in New Zealand as a discursive field. Sociologia Ruralis, 41(1), 21–39. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00168en
dc.identifier.issn0038−0199
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/5248
dc.description.abstractThe New Zealand organic industry has grown rapidly over the last ten years. While New Zealand did have a small organic agriculture social movement from the 1970s, the size and scope of the industry increased rapidly during the 1990s as a result of large export companies establishing organic product lines. This transformation, and the eventual resistance to corporate styles of organic exporting, provides a useful case study of the way in which organic standards are constructed, reconstructed and circulated. By using discourse analysis the processes by which ideas of ‘organic’ were formed in the 1980s and then solidified (and contested) in the 1990s can be explored and various consequences identified. Rather than displaying a linear logic, by which organic agriculture movements are seemingly inevitably commoditized and corporatized, the New Zealand case provides evidence of the peculiar nature of organic agriculture as a part of the standardizing global food system.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishersen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofSociologia Ruralisen_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9523.00168/abstracten_NZ
dc.subjectOrganic agricultureen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.subjectOrganic standardsen_NZ
dc.subjectcertificationen_NZ
dc.subjectauditen_NZ
dc.subjectsocial movementsen_NZ
dc.titleNaming Organics: understanding organic standards in New Zealand as a discursive fielden_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2014-11-19T20:34:38Z
otago.schoolCentre for Sustainabilityen_NZ
otago.relation.issue1en_NZ
otago.relation.volume41en_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1467-9523.00168en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage39en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage21en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
dc.rights.statement©European Society for Rural Sociologyen_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record