Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Hugh
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorSivak, Leda
dc.date.available2014-12-04T19:42:49Z
dc.date.copyright2000
dc.identifier.citationCampbell, H., Fitzgerald, R., Saunders, C., & Sivak, L. (2000). Strategic Issues for GMOs in Primary Production: Key Economic Drivers and Emerging Issues (Discussion Paper). University of Otago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/5323en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/5323
dc.description.abstractThe Warrant of the Royal Commission of Enquiry into Genetic Modification asks a range of questions about the kinds of consequences (health, environmental, legal, cultural, ethical and economic) that might occur should GM technologies be commercially released in New Zealand. These are important questions, as New Zealand is one of only a few countries that rely on food exports to generate a major proportion of national revenue, but which have not yet released GMOs into commercial production of food, fibre or nutriceuticals. Focussing specifically on the economic consequences of commercial GM production, there is clearly both an opportunity for unique economic outcomes that must be considered, and also a series of major methodological challenges surrounding how we might quantify the nature of these opportunities given that such an exercise is entirely predictive (ie. we have no actual commercial production of GMOs to evaluate). This difficulty is evidenced by the level of claims-making taking place about the potential economic value to New Zealand of either avoiding or encouraging GM technologies in commercial production of food, fibre and nutriceuticals. There are clearly few certainties in this discussion. The New York Times reported in 1999 that even Monsanto had hired a group of independent consultants to try and estimate the nature of the biotechnology landscape in several decades time (‘Plotting Corporate Futures: Outlining What Could Go Wrong’ New York Times: 24/6/99). The consultants drew up three scenarios – one reasonably positive, one uncertain and contingent on the outcomes of many unpredictable variables, and one primarily negative for GM food. However, they were unable to recommend which one they considered the most likely to happen. Such caution is scarcely reflected in some of the recent claims-making in public fora about the presumed benefits and disadvantages of either a biotechnologically- driven or GM-free economic future for New Zealand.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherUniversity of Otagoen_NZ
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectGMOsen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.subjectRoyal Commission on GMOsen_NZ
dc.subjectrisken_NZ
dc.subjectAnthropologyen_NZ
dc.subjectArchaeologyen_NZ
dc.titleStrategic Issues for GMOs in Primary Production: Key Economic Drivers and Emerging Issuesen_NZ
dc.typeDiscussion Paperen_NZ
dc.date.updated2014-12-04T02:38:36Z
otago.schoolCentre for Sustainabilityen_NZ
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International