Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoller, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorMacLeod, Catriona
dc.contributor.authorHaggerty, Julia
dc.contributor.authorRosin, Chris
dc.contributor.authorBlackwell, Grant
dc.contributor.authorPerley, Chris
dc.contributor.authorMeadows, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorWeller, Florian
dc.contributor.authorGradwohl, Markus
dc.date.available2014-12-07T22:12:36Z
dc.date.copyright2008
dc.identifier.citationMoller, H., MacLeod, C., Haggerty, J., Rosin, C., Blackwell, G., Perley, C., … Gradwohl, M. (2008). Intensification of New Zealand agriculture: Implications for biodiversity. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 51(3), 253–263. doi:10.1080/00288230809510453en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/5355
dc.description.abstractIntensification of New Zealand agricultural practices is an ongoing and accelerating process which potentially threatens the environment, biodiversity and even the sustainability of agricultural production. However, neither the exact nature of this threat nor the extent of its impact has received adequate analysis. There is clear evidence that agricultural intensification has degraded aquatic biodiversity, but there is a critical lack of research and monitoring of robust indicators of terrestrial biodiversity in New Zealand production landscapes. Therefore, we can only infer a generalised likelihood that intensification has also reduced terrestrial biodiversity and agro‐ecosystem resilience. It is unknown whether biodiversity and ecological services provided by the actual land growing crops, pasture or wood fibre are degrading because of intensification. Increased use of ecological subsidies (nutrient and energy inputs) may have compensated, at least in part, for the increased rate of food production (nutrient and energy outputs). Lasting practical solutions to enhance sustainability can only be identified by long‐term transdisciplinary research of ecological disturbance in agro‐ecosystems. Working with intensification to identify environmental and social gains at the same time as capturing economic efficiencies is more likely to support biodiversity than simply attempting to stem or reverse intensification. A change in world view of both rural and urban dwellers, from the predominant philosophy that allocates land to either preservation or production to one that promotes sustainable land‐use practices that integrate extractive resource use with conservation, is the key to mitigating impacts of agricultural intensification in modified landscapes.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofNew Zealand Journal of Agricultural Researchen_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00288230809510453#.VITFOskaOusen_NZ
dc.subjectbiodiversity conservationen_NZ
dc.subjectintensificationen_NZ
dc.subjectindicatorsen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealand agricultureen_NZ
dc.titleIntensification of New Zealand agriculture: Implications for biodiversityen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2014-12-07T21:29:46Z
otago.schoolCentre for Sustainabilityen_NZ
otago.relation.issue3en_NZ
otago.relation.volume51en_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00288230809510453en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage263en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage253en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
dc.rights.statement© The Royal Society of New Zealand 2008en_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record