Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Des
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorMoller, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Elaine
dc.contributor.authorPickerell, Georgina
dc.date.available2015-03-10T22:47:05Z
dc.date.copyright2008
dc.identifier.citationSmith, D., Wilson, D., Moller, H., Murphy, E., & Pickerell, G. (2008). Stoat density, diet and survival compared between alpine grassland and beech forest habitats. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 32(2), 166–176.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/5513
dc.description.abstractIn New Zealand, alpine grasslands occur above the treeline of beech forest. Historically stoat control paradigms in New Zealand’s montane natural areas have assumed alpine grassland is a marginal habitat that limits dispersal between beech forest stoat populations. We compared the summer-to-autumn (January–April) density, weight, diet and winter survival of stoats between these two habitatsduring years of low beech seedfall. Stoats were live-trapped, marked and released in alpine grassland and low-altitude beech forest in the Borland Valley, Fiordland National Park, during 2003 and 2004, and were caught and euthanased for necropsy in 2005. Stoat density was estimated using spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR). The proportion of stoats marked in one year but recaptured in the next was used as a measure of ‘observed survival’. Prey remains were identified from scats collected during 2003 and 2004 and stomachs from stoats killed in 2005. Stoat density was similar in both habitats over the two years, about one stoat per square kilometre. Observed survival from 2003–2004 was also similar, but survival from 2004–2005 was higher in alpine grassland than in beech forest. In 2003, male stoats were on average heavier in alpine grassland than in beech forest, although average weights were similar in the other years. Diet differed significantly between the two habitats, with stoats in alpine grasslands eating mainly ground weta (a large invertebrate) (72%) and hares (23%), while stoats in beech forest ate mainly birds (31%) and mice (19%). Collectively these results suggest that alpine grasslands are not a poor quality habitat for stoats. Traditionally it has been thought that stoats cannot survive on invertebrate prey alone. This research demonstrates that stoats relying largely on invertebrate prey can occur at similar densities and with equivalent survival to stoats relying on vertebrate prey.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherNew Zealand Journal of Ecologyen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofNew Zealand Journal of Ecologyen_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://newzealandecology.org/nzje/2874en_NZ
dc.subjectChionochloaen_NZ
dc.subjectMustela ermineaen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.subjectsnow tussocken_NZ
dc.titleStoat density, diet and survival compared between alpine grassland and beech forest habitatsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2015-03-10T22:42:02Z
otago.schoolCentre for Sustainabilityen_NZ
otago.relation.issue2en_NZ
otago.relation.volume32en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage176en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage166en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
dc.rights.statementCopyright in this material is owned by the New Zealand Ecological Society Inc (NZES). The material with an original publication date greater than three years old may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission.en_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record