Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWooliscroft, Ben
dc.date.available2015-04-23T23:17:50Z
dc.date.copyright2015
dc.identifier.citationWooliscroft, B. (2015). National Household Survey of Energy and Transportation: Energy Cultures Two. Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago.en
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-9941219-0-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/5634
dc.description.abstractExecutive Summary Key findings: • A clear picture of the state of the energy efficiency of our housing stock, our household energy behaviours and our driving (and transport) behaviours has been collected. • Four clear clusters of energy consumers are identified: – The Energy Comfortable (23.7%) have less remedial (e.g. dehumidifier) energy use. They live in warm dry houses. – The Energy Poor (21.1%) not only have the lowest incomes, they also have the lowest number of energy efficiency household modifications and practise the least number of energy saving driving behaviours. – The Energy Average (24.6%) are exactly that, exceptional in very few attributes. There are significant opportunities for them to save energy. – The Energy Efficient (24.3%) earn a similar amount to the Energy Average and the Energy Comfortable but have power bills similar to the Energy Poor. • New Zealand’s housing stock is frequently not adequately insulated or efficiently heated • Many New Zealanders do not practise energy saving behaviours around the house, including behaviour as simple as turning off lights in un-occupied rooms. This research gives insight into the frequency with which behaviours are practised. • There is considerable opportunity to save money through efficient driving (most estimates are 15%) however many efficient driving behaviours are not practised by our sample. • The earthquake in Christchurch is clearly found in the results with regard to heating, transportation and traffic issues. • Poor energy behaviour in the house is strongly related to poor driving (from an energy point of view) and a low energy efficient house. • The results would suggest that a systems approach to improving energy consumption will reap the best rewards.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherCentre for Sustainability, University of Otagoen_NZ
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEnergyen_NZ
dc.subjectHousehold Energyen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.subjectTransporten_NZ
dc.subjectEnergy Pooren_NZ
dc.subjectenergy consumersen_NZ
dc.subjectEnergy behaviouren_NZ
dc.subjectEnergy savingen_NZ
dc.subjectEnergy efficiencyen_NZ
dc.titleNational Household Survey of Energy and Transportation: Energy Cultures Twoen_NZ
dc.typeOtheren_NZ
dc.date.updated2015-04-23T22:24:36Z
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International