Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDawes, Gregory W.
dc.date.available2011-02-14T02:45:51Z
dc.date.copyright2002
dc.identifier.citationDawes, G. W. (2002). Could There Be Another Galileo Case? Galileo, Augustine, and Vatican II. Journal of Religion and Society, 4.en
dc.identifier.issn1522-5658
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/564
dc.description.abstractIn his 1615 letter to the Grand Duchess Christina of Lorraine, Galileo argues for a “principle of limitation”: the authority of Scripture should not be invoked in scientific matters. In doing so, he claims to be following the example of St Augustine. But Augustine’s position would be better described as a “principle of differing purpose”: although the Scriptures were not written in order to reveal scientific truths, such matters may still be covered by biblical authority. The Roman Catholic Church has rejected Galileo’s principle, opting rather for Augustine’s, leaving open the possibility of future conflicts between scientists and Church authority.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherCreighton Universityen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Religion and Societyen_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://www.creighton.edu/JRS
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/*
dc.subjectGalileo Galilei; St Augustine; biblical hermeneutics; Copernicus; science and religionen_NZ
dc.titleCould There Be Another Galileo Case? Galileo, Augustine, and Vatican IIen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
otago.schoolPhilosophyen_NZ
otago.relation.volume4en_NZ
otago.openaccessOpen
dc.rights.statementJRS is already an open-access journal.
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported