Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoore, Jennifer
dc.date.available2016-01-10T20:39:48Z
dc.date.copyright2014
dc.identifier.citationJennifer Moore "An empirical approach to the New Zealand government's review of the coronial jurisdiction" (2014) 21 JLM 602.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/6147
dc.description.abstractGiven the public profile of New Zealand coroners, it is surprising that there has been limited empirical research about coroners’ decision-making. This article uses evidence from New Zealand’s first empirical study of coroners’ recommendations to discuss the New Zealand government’s recent review of the coronial jurisdiction. In June and October 2013, New Zealand’s Courts Minister announced proposed changes to the coronial system. Several of the Minister’s proposals are consistent with the empirical evidence, but there are also significant gaps in the review. The Minister’s review acknowledges the importance of coroners’ preventive function, but will the proposals enable New Zealand’s coronial law to achieve its full preventive potential? The empirical evidence suggests that the prophylactic potential of coroners’ recommendations is not being maximised.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherThomson Reutersen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Law and Medicineen_NZ
dc.subjectcoronersen_NZ
dc.subjectcoroners' recommendationsen_NZ
dc.subjectempiricalen_NZ
dc.subjectsocio-legalen_NZ
dc.subjectpublic policyen_NZ
dc.titleAn Empirical Approach to the New Zealand Government’s Review of the Coronial Jurisdictionen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2016-01-09T19:17:25Z
otago.schoolFaculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.volume21en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage626en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage602en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Only
dc.rights.statementPlease note that this article is being provided for research purposes and is not to be reproduced in any way. If you refer to the article in any way, please ensure that you acknowledge both the publication and publisher appropriately. The citation for the journal is in the footline of each page. Should you wish to reproduce this article, either in part or in its entirety, in any medium, please ensure you seek permission from our permissions officer. Please email any queries to LTA.permissions@thomsonretuers.comen_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record