Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoore, Jennifer
dc.date.available2016-01-11T02:02:16Z
dc.date.copyright2011
dc.identifier.citationJennifer Moore "Traumatised Bodies: Towards Corporeality in New Zealand’s Privacy Tort Cases Involving Accident Victims" (2011) 24 New Zealand Universities Law Review 386en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/6155
dc.description.abstractThis article combines several different literatures (legal, medical and theoretical) in order to explore privacy law cases which involve accident survivors. I adopt an inductive methodology which emphasises the accident survivors' experiences. Their accounts demonstrate their position of special vulnerability. However, accident survivors currently receive inadequate protection because the New Zealand privacy tort does not recognise their special vulnerable status. The accident survivors' privacy claim in Andrews v TVNZ, for example, failed because the Court held that the publication was not highly offensive. The legal status quo is problematic because accident survivors whose privacy has been breached expect the law to provide protection at a time when they are vulnerable and unable to protect themselves. The privacy intrusions experienced by accident survivors cause adverse health outcomes. Alternative perspectives from theoretical and empirical medicine reveal the extent of the problem and help to suggest necessary reforms. This literature justifies recognising accident survivors as a special class of plaintiffs. New Zealand's privacy tort could be reformed by presuming that they have a reasonable expectation of privacy and that images of accidents are distressing and humiliating.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherThomson Reutersen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofNew Zealand Universities Law Reviewen_NZ
dc.subjectprivacy lawen_NZ
dc.subjectprivacy torten_NZ
dc.subjectaccident survivorsen_NZ
dc.subjectaccidentsen_NZ
dc.titleTraumatised Bodies: Towards Corporeality in New Zealand’s Privacy Tort Law Involving Accident Survivorsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2016-01-10T18:59:45Z
otago.schoolFaculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.volume24en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage420en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage386en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Only
dc.rights.statementCopyright of New Zealand Universities Law Review is the property of Thomson Reuters (New Zealand) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.en_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record