Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLont, David
dc.contributor.authorCrowley, John (Jack) Peter
dc.date.available2016-01-27T19:34:42Z
dc.date.copyright2016
dc.identifier.citationCrowley, J. (Jack) P. (2016). Time to call noise control? The determinants of non-GAAP earnings disclosure in New Zealand and IFRS adoption (Thesis, Master of Business). University of Otago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/6186en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/6186
dc.description.abstractI hand-collect non-GAAP earnings disclosures made by New Zealand firms to consider whether the characteristics of disclosers are consistent with informative or opportunistic (turning up the noise) disclosure incentives. I find evidence that both types of incentives are important. Commentators frequently suggest that firms informatively disclose non-GAAP earnings because IFRS fails to adequately capture underlying performance. I find that IFRS is associated with an increased probability of non-GAAP earnings disclosure; and an increased probability that disclosers will provide high-quality reconciliations, whereas opportunistically-linked firm characteristics are negatively associated with reconciliation quality. One interpretation is that this corroborates commentators’ arguments. The Financial Market Authority provides guidance on the best disclosure practices; however, I fail to find evidence that opportunistically-linked firm characteristics are less likely to shape non-GAAP disclosure after the introduction of this guidance. Conversely, this guidance is positively associated with reconciliation quality which could imply that some latent reduction in opportunism has occurred. Some informatively-linked firm characteristics are positively associated with reconciliation quality, while others are negatively associated. Evidence suggests that the emphasis placed on non-GAAP earnings is a function of both informativeness and opportunism. This suggests that any regulatory restrictions constraining the disclosure or emphasis of non-GAAP earnings or demanding high-quality reconciliations (‘calling noise control’) would be likely to restrict the practices of both informative and opportunistic disclosers. Lastly, while there is limited evidence that the decision to disclose well-defined, commonly-used non-GAAP earnings metrics (EB metrics) has the potential to be opportunistically motivated, evidence suggests these measures are opportunistically emphasised. This warrants concern about the use of all forms of non-GAAP earnings.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Otago
dc.rightsAll items in OUR Archive are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subjectnon-GAAP earnings
dc.subjectIFRS
dc.subjectNew Zealand
dc.titleTime to call noise control? The determinants of non-GAAP earnings disclosure in New Zealand and IFRS adoption
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.updated2016-01-27T08:06:11Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
thesis.degree.disciplineAccounting & Finance
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Business
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Otago
thesis.degree.levelMasters
otago.openaccessOpen
dc.identifier.wikidataQ112923824
otago.wikidata.urlhttps://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q112923824
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record