Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorScott, Michelle Grace
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Alaric
dc.contributor.authorFord, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorStephenson, Janet
dc.contributor.authorGorrie, Seth
dc.date.available2016-02-23T19:51:37Z
dc.date.copyright2016-01-09
dc.identifier.citationScott, M. G., McCarthy, A., Ford, R., Stephenson, J., & Gorrie, S. (2016). Evaluating the impact of energy interventions: home audits vs. community events. Energy Efficiency, 1–20. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9420-9en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/6235
dc.description.abstractNew Zealand’s housing stock tends to be of low thermal quality that can adversely affect the health and well-being of occupants as well as costing more than necessary to heat. Householders need information and motivation to make material changes and adopt new practices to achieve warmer and more energy-efficient homes. This study compares two different types of energy interventions with householders in three different suburbs in Dunedin, New Zealand. Two suburbs received a home energy audit whereby an auditor surveyed each house and provided personalised advice. Householders in the third suburb took part in community energy events that included general advice and practical workshops. The impacts of these interventions were evaluated through pre- and post-intervention surveys and post-intervention interviews. Home energy audits were successful in encouraging change both behavioural and practical, where it was possible. The energy events promoted community engagement and awareness relating to energy-saving actions. Participant feedback suggests that a combination of both types of intervention may be most effective in promoting household change, beginning with energy events in communities before offering home energy audits. This would enable people to share their thoughts and concerns about energy with the support of their social networks and engender trust in the process, before offering personalised audits. Overall, the results show that interventions need to be correctly targeted to appropriate communities to be effective.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherSpringer Linken_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Efficiencyen_NZ
dc.subjectEnergyen_NZ
dc.subjectHousingen_NZ
dc.subjectInterventionen_NZ
dc.subjectGreen Griden_NZ
dc.subjectHome Energy Auditen_NZ
dc.subjectCommunity eventsen_NZ
dc.subjectBehaviour changeen_NZ
dc.titleEvaluating the impact of energy interventions: home audits vs. community eventsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2016-02-23T08:38:47Z
otago.schoolCentre for Sustainability, University of Otagoen_NZ
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9420-9en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage20en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage1en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
dc.rights.statementThe online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s12053-015-9420-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.en_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record