Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrickell, Chris
dc.date.available2016-06-01T04:41:37Z
dc.date.copyright2005
dc.identifier.citationBrickell, C. (2005). Masculinites, Performativity, and Subversion: A Sociological Reappraisal. Men and Masculinities, 8(1), 24–43. doi:10.1177/1097184X03257515en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/6514
dc.description.abstractThe study of masculinities has not escaped the influence of Judith Butler’s writings on gender, performativity, and subversion. However, this article suggests that Butler’s formulations of performativity and subversion express a lack of clarity and engender a number of problems with respect to agency, action, interaction, and social change. This article argues for reformulating performativity and subversion in a more explicitly sociological frame to render the concepts more useful for examining agency and subjectivity in the study of masculinities. The writings of Erving Goffman suggest ways to reclaim the socially constructed agency of “performance” from the mire of “performativity,” with the latter’s apparent disappearance of subjective action. This article suggests reworking subversion away from parody and resignification toward a consideration of resources for subjectivity and challenges to prevailing social structures. In this way, performativity and subversion may be set more convincingly within a sociologically informed study of masculinity.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofMen and Masculinitiesen_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://jmm.sagepub.com/content/8/1/24en_NZ
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectmasculinityen_NZ
dc.subjectsubversionen_NZ
dc.subjectJudith Butleren_NZ
dc.subjectperformativityen_NZ
dc.subjectsociologyen_NZ
dc.subjectErving Goffmanen_NZ
dc.titleMasculinites, Performativity, and Subversion: A Sociological Reappraisalen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2016-06-01T02:40:51Z
otago.schoolSociology, Gender and Social Worken_NZ
otago.relation.issue1en_NZ
otago.relation.volume8en_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1097184X03257515en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage43en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage24en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
dc.rights.statement© 2005 Sage Publicationsen_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International