Sexuality and the Dimensions of Power
|dc.identifier.citation||Brickell, C. (2008). Sexuality and the Dimensions of Power. Sexuality and Culture, 13(2), 57–74. doi:10.1007/s12119-008-9042-x||en|
|dc.description.abstract||Power, many scholars agree, is intrinsic to the relationships between sexuality, individual experience and social dynamics. Beyond this basic agreement, though, writers and researchers have adopted different foci. This article critically reviews several approaches to the power–sex relationship, and suggests that four readily discernable but interlaced dimensions of power operate upon the sexual: definitional, regulatory, productive and unequal. As a number of examples from the literature show, these ideal typical forms twist and interweave in both theory and practice. I suggest that to be mindful of all four facets of power and their interre- lationships is to account for multiplicity, and to avoid the reductive characterizations that have sometimes characterized academic writings on power and sexuality. In this way, both theory and research in the area of human sexuality can be more thoroughly conceptualized.||en_NZ|
|dc.relation.ispartof||Sexuality and Culture||en_NZ|
|dc.rights||Attribution 4.0 International||*|
|dc.title||Sexuality and the Dimensions of Power||en_NZ|
|otago.school||Sociology, Gender and Social Work||en_NZ|
|dc.rights.statement||© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008||en_NZ|
Files in this item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.
If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.