Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeddell, Emily
dc.date.available2016-06-21T04:18:17Z
dc.date.copyright2014
dc.identifier.citationKeddell, E. (2014). Weighing it up: family maintenance discourses in NGO child protection decision-making in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Child and Family Social Work, 916–940. doi:10.1111/cfs.12168en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/6603
dc.description.abstractExamining the concepts underpinning the reasoning processes of social worker's decision-making provides important insights into how social work practice is undertaken. This paper examines one of the major discourses used by social workers in decision reasoning in a non-governmental organization child protection context in Aotearoa/New Zealand: family maintenance. This study found that family maintenance as a concept was strongly privileged by social workers. This resulted in attempts to preserve families and created a hierarchy of preferred decision outcomes. A preference for family maintenance was supported by legal, moral, psychological and Māori cultural concepts. This pattern of constructs underpinned the ‘weighing up of harms’ when considering removal, and generally reflected a child welfare orientation. In addition to this, it was found that ‘family’ was broadly defined, and could include people who had a relationship with the children, or Māori definitions of extended family, in addition to legal ones.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltden_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofChild and Family Social Worken_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.12168/abstracten_NZ
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectJudgementen_NZ
dc.subjectchild protectionen_NZ
dc.subjectfamily presentationen_NZ
dc.subjectchild abuseen_NZ
dc.titleWeighing it up: family maintenance discourses in NGO child protection decision-making in Aotearoa/New Zealanden_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2016-06-21T04:03:21Z
otago.schoolSociology, Gender and Social Worken_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cfs.12168en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage940en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage916en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
dc.rights.statement© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltden_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International