Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeddell, Emily
dc.date.available2016-06-22T02:27:24Z
dc.date.copyright2011
dc.identifier.citationKeddell, E. (2011). Reasoning Processes in Child Protection Decision Making: Negotiating Moral Minefields and Risky Relationships. British Journal of Social Work, 41(7), 1251–1270. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr012en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/6612
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the reasoning processes of social workers in child protection social work as they make decisions. Within this interpretive process, they assign meaning to clients' behaviours in a context containing a multitude of competing discourses relating to the nature and cause of clients' problems. The study used a qualitative approach, specifically a critical incident framework. It asked workers to describe cases they felt ‘pleased with’ and explain the reasoning processes they used in those cases. It also asked clients their views of decisions made about them. This article draws on social constructionist theorising to describe and analyse the discourses used to frame the aims of practice and the causes of clients' problems. It found that workers valued family maintenance and sought to bolster this while managing potential risk. In the cases selected by workers, they constructed the causes of clients' problems in non-blaming but individualised ways, viewed clients as being capable of change and honest in their dealings with workers. It is proposed that these ways of viewing contributed to maintaining relationships with clients despite the challenges of balancing risk, care, control and power.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Social Worken_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/7/1251.abstracten_NZ
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectbest practiceen_NZ
dc.subjectchild protectionen_NZ
dc.subjectsocial constructionismen_NZ
dc.subjectsocial work practiceen_NZ
dc.subjectdecision-makingen_NZ
dc.subjectjudgementen_NZ
dc.subjectethicsen_NZ
dc.titleReasoning Processes in Child Protection Decision Making: Negotiating Moral Minefields and Risky Relationshipsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2016-06-22T02:19:18Z
otago.schoolSociology, Gender and Social Worken_NZ
otago.relation.issue7en_NZ
otago.relation.volume41en_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjsw/bcr012en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage1270en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage1251en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
dc.rights.statementCopyright © 2011, British Association of Social Workersen_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International