Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBeres, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorSenn, Charlene
dc.contributor.authorMcCaw, Jodee
dc.identifier.citationBeres, M., Senn, C., & McCaw, J. (2014). Navigating Ambivalence: How Heterosexual Young Adults Make Sense of Desire Differences. Journal of Sex Research, 51(7), 765–776. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.792327en
dc.description.abstractThe miscommunication hypothesis is the assumption that many incidents of acquaintance rape and coercive sex follow from miscommunication between men and women. This hypothesis is entrenched in popular, academic, and judicial understandings of sexual relationships. Recently some evidence has suggested that there is little miscommunication between sexual partners and that the hypothesis does not explain acquaintance rape or other forms of sexual violence. The present study used qualitative methodology in which men and women were asked to imagine themselves in a particular heterosexual dating situation and write what they think happened between the beginning (when sex was refused by one partner) and the end (when sex happened). Thematic analysis of the data found no evidence for miscommunication between partners under conditions of differences in desire. Instead, ambivalence about sexual activity was commonly described by women and men and was most often resolved to both parties’ satisfaction. Coercion by men was present in a minority of narratives under conditions of clear understanding of women's refusals. The study thus provides a rich, experience-based representation of heterosexual sexual activity, with considerable potential for the development of effective education campaigns.en_NZ
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Sex Researchen_NZ
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.subjectsexual consenten_NZ
dc.subjectrape preventionen_NZ
dc.titleNavigating Ambivalence: How Heterosexual Young Adults Make Sense of Desire Differencesen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
otago.schoolSociology, Gender and Social Worken_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
dc.rights.statementCopyright © 2014 Taylor & Francisen_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International