How Mental Health Clinicians View Community Treatment Orders: A National New Zealand Survey
|dc.identifier.citation||Romans, S., Dawson, J., Mullen, R., & Gibbs, A. (2004). How Mental Health Clinicians View Community Treatment Orders: A National New Zealand Survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 836–841. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01470.x||en|
|dc.description.abstract||Objective: To determine New Zealand mental health clinicians' views about community treatment orders, indications for their use, their benefits, problems and impact on patients and therapeutic relationships. Method: A national survey of New Zealand psychiatrists and a regional survey of nonpsychiatric community mental health professionals for comparison. Results: The great majority of NZ psychiatrists prefer to work with community treatment orders as an option. They consider they are used properly in most cases, can enhance patients' priority for care, provide a structure for treatment, support continuing contact and produce a period of stability for patients during which other therapeutic changes can occur. They consider these orders can harm therapeutic relationships, especially in the short term, but when used appropriately their overall benefits outweigh their coercive impact. The other mental health professionals surveyed have similar views. A minority of clinicians do not support their use. Conclusions: The precise impact of community treatment orders on patients' quality of life remains an open question. Until that matter is more clearly resolved, New Zealand law should continue to authorise compulsory outpatient care, provided it is carefully targeted and adequate community services are available.||en_NZ|
|dc.relation.ispartof||Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry||en_NZ|
|dc.rights||Attribution 4.0 International||*|
|dc.subject||community treatment orders||en_NZ|
|dc.title||How Mental Health Clinicians View Community Treatment Orders: A National New Zealand Survey||en_NZ|
|otago.school||Sociology, Gender and Social Work||en_NZ|
|dc.rights.statement||Copyright © 2004, © SAGE Publications||en_NZ|
Files in this item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.
If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.