Notice

This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at: https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/773

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGriffin, Paul Aen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorLont, David Hen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorSun, Yuanen_NZ
dc.date.available2011-04-07T03:02:40Z
dc.date.copyright2007en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationGriffin, P. A., Lont, D. H., & Sun, Y. (2007). Agency Problems and Audit Fees: Further Tests of the Free Cash Flow Hypothesis. Accountancy Working Paper Series presented at the AAA 2007 Conference & AFAANZ 2007 Conference.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/774
dc.description.abstractThis study finds that the agency problems of companies with high free cash flow (FCF) and low growth opportunities induce auditors of companies in the United States to raise audit fees to compensate for the additional effort. We also find that high FCF companies with high growth prospects have higher audit fees. In both cases, higher debt levels moderate the increased fees, consistent with the role of debt as a monitoring mechanism. Other mechanisms to mitigate the agency costs of FCF such as dividend payout and share repurchase (not studied earlier) do not moderate the higher audit fees.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAccountancy Working Paper Seriesen_NZ
dc.relation.isreplacedby803en_NZ
dc.subjectAudit feesen_NZ
dc.subjectFree cash flow hypothesisen_NZ
dc.subjectAgency problemsen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF Commerceen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF5601 Accountingen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF5601 Accountingen_NZ
dc.titleAgency Problems and Audit Fees: Further Tests of the Free Cash Flow Hypothesisen_NZ
dc.typeConference or Workshop Item (Seminar, Speech or Other Presentation)en_NZ
dc.description.versionPublisheden_NZ
otago.date.accession2009-12-03 21:26:14en_NZ
otago.openaccessOpen
dc.identifier.eprints849en_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
otago.school.eprintsAccountancy & Business Lawen_NZ
dc.description.referencesAdam, T., and V. Goyal, 2008, The investment opportunity set and its proxy variables, Journal of Financial Research 31, 41-63. Allen, F., and R. Michaely, 2003, Payout policy, in G. Constantinidies, M. Hariss, and R. Stulz. (Eds.), Handbooks in Economics and Finance, North-Holland. Australian Auditing Standard AUS 202, 2002, Objectives and general principles governing an audit of a financial report, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, Melbourne, July. Australian Auditing Standard ASA 315, 2006, Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, Melbourne, April. Barclay, M., and W. Smith, Jr, 1995, The maturity structure of corporate debt, Journal of Finance 50,609-632. Bell, T., W. Landsman, B. Miller, and S. Yeh, 2002, The valuation implications of employee stock option accounting for profitable computer software firms, The Accounting Review 77, 971-996. Blanchard, O., F. Lopez-di-Silanes, and A. Shleifer, 1994, What do firms do with cash windfalls? Journal of Financial Economics 36, 337-360. Blouin, J., and M. Nondorf, 2004, Payout policy: A shareholder-level analysis, Working paper (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania). Chan, K., D. Ikenberry, I. Lee, and Y. Wang, 2007, Share repurchase as a tool to mislead investors: Evidence from earnings quality and stock performance, Working paper (University of Hong Kong,Pokfulam, Hong Kong). Choi, J., and T. Wong, 2007, Auditors’ governance functions and legal environments: An international investigation, Contemporary Accounting Research 24, 13-46. Chung, R., M. Firth, and J. Kim, 2005, Earnings management, surplus free cash flow, and external monitoring, Journal of Business Research 58, 766-776. Cohen, J., G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright, 2002, Corporate governance and the audit process, Contemporary Accounting Research 19, 573-593. Desai, M., and L. Jin, 2007, Institutional tax clienteles and payout policy, Working paper (Harvard University, Boston, MA). Ferguson, A., and S. Taylor, 2007, Free cash flow, debt monitoring and audit fees: A re-examination, Working Paper (University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW). Griffin, P, D. Lont, and Y. Sun, 2008, Corporate governance and audit fees: Evidence of countervailing relations, Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 4, 18-49. Griffin, P., and D. Lont, 2005, The effect of auditor dismissals and resignations on audit fees: Evidence based on SEC disclosures under Sarbanes-Oxley, Working paper (University of California at Davis, Davis, CA). Grinstein, Y., and R. Michaely, 2005, Institutional holdings and payout policy, The Journal of Finance 60, 1389-1426. Grullon, G., and R. Michaely, 2004, The information content of share repurchase programs, The Journal of Finance 59, 651-680. Guay, W., and J. Harford, 2000, The cash-flow performance and information content of dividend increases versus repurchases, Journal of Financial Economics 57, 385-415. Gul, F., and J. Tsui, 1998, A test of the free cash flow and debt monitoring hypotheses: Evidence from auditing pricing, Journal of Accounting and Economics 24, 219-237. Gul, F., and J. Tsui, 2001, Free cash flow, debt monitoring, and audit pricing: Further evidence on the role of director equity ownership, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20, 71-86. Gul, F., C. Chen, and J. Tsui, 2003, Discretionary accounting accruals, managers’ incentives, and audit fees, Contemporary Accounting Research 20, 441-464. Harford, J., 1999, Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions, The Journal of Finance 5, 1969-1997. Jaggi, B., and F. Gul, 2005, Evidence of accruals management: A test of the free cash flow and debt monitoring hypotheses, Working paper (The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ). Jensen, M., 1986, Agency costs of FCF, corporate finance, and takeovers, The American Economic Review 76, 323-329. Jensen, M., 1988, Takeovers: Their causes and consequences, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, 21-48. Jung, K., Y. Kim, and R. Stulz, 1996, Timing, investment opportunities, managerial discretion, and the security issue decision, Journal of Financial Economics 42, 159-185. Lang, L., R. Stulz, and R. Walkling, 1991, A test of the free cash flow hypothesis, the case of bidder returns, Journal of Financial Economics 29, 315-335. Lehn, K., and A. Poulsen, 1989, Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions, The Journal of Finance 44, 771-787. Lennox, C., 2005, Management ownership and audit firm size, Contemporary Accounting Research 22, 205-227. Myers, S., 1977, Determinants of corporate borrowing, Journal of Financial Economics 5, 147–175. Myers, S., and N. Majluf, 1984, Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that Investors do not have, Journal of Financial Economics 13,187-221. Oded, J., 2008, Payout policy, financial flexibility, and agency costs of free cash flow, Working paper (Boston University, Boston, WA). Opler, T., L. Pinkowitz, R. Stulz, and R. Williamson, 2001, Corporate Cash Holdings, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 14, 55-66. Richardson, S., 2006, Over-investment of free cash flow, Review of Accounting Studies 11, 159-189. Rubin, P., 1990, Managing Business Transactions, Free Press, New York. Shin, H., and R. Stulz, 1998, Are internal capital markets efficient? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 531-552. Simunic, D., 1980, The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence, Journal of Accounting Research 18, 161-190. Tabachnick, B., and L. S. Fidell, 2007, Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th edition. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers. Tsui, J., B. Jaggi, and F. Gul, 2001, CEO domination, growth opportunities, and their impact on audit fees, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 16, 189-208.en_NZ
otago.event.dates5-8 Aug 2007 (AAA) & AFANZ 1 - 3 July 2007en_NZ
otago.event.placeAAA Chicago USA & AFAANZ Gold Coast Australiaen_NZ
otago.event.typeconferenceen_NZ
otago.event.titleAAA 2007 Conference & AFAANZ 2007 Conferenceen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemEditorDateSummary

*Selected version