Westpac v Chahil: Sometimes Words Just Mean What They Say
View/
Cite this item:
Simon Connell, Westpac v Chahil: Sometimes Words Just Mean What They Say, Australian Business Law Review (Volume 40 Part 3), June 2012.
Permanent link to OUR Archive version:
http://hdl.handle.net/10523/8636
Abstract:
This case note uses the decision of Westpac v Chahil to demonstate that the plain meaning of words can still prevail under the modern approach to contract interpretation.
Date:
2012
Publisher:
Thomson Reuters
Pages:
213-216
Keywords:
Contract law; Interpretation; New Zealand; Westpac v Chahil
Research Type:
Journal Article
Languages:
English
Collections
- Journal Article [661]
- Law Collection [383]