| dc.contributor.author | Connell, Simon | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-29T20:26:19Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Simon Connell, Westpac v Chahil: Sometimes Words Just Mean What They Say, Australian Business Law Review (Volume 40 Part 3), June 2012. | en_NZ |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10523/8636 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This case note uses the decision of Westpac v Chahil to demonstate that the plain meaning of words can still prevail under the modern approach to contract interpretation. | en_NZ |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_NZ |
| dc.publisher | Thomson Reuters | en_NZ |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Australian Business Law Review | en_NZ |
| dc.subject | Contract law | en_NZ |
| dc.subject | Interpretation | en_NZ |
| dc.subject | New Zealand | en_NZ |
| dc.subject | Westpac v Chahil | en_NZ |
| dc.title | Westpac v Chahil: Sometimes Words Just Mean What They Say | en_NZ |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en_NZ |
| dc.date.updated | 2018-11-28T21:15:41Z | |
| otago.school | University of Otago Faculty of Law | en_NZ |
| otago.relation.volume | 40 | en_NZ |
| otago.bitstream.endpage | 216 | en_NZ |
| otago.bitstream.startpage | 213 | en_NZ |
| otago.openaccess | Open | en_NZ |
