Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenaghan, Mark
dc.date.available2018-11-29T22:08:15Z
dc.date.copyright2011
dc.identifier.citationChild and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 155-177, 2011.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8676
dc.description.abstractRelocation cases have become a very significant aspect of family law. This article examines the difficulties in deciding (and predicting the outcomes of) national and international relocation cases. The article questions the usefulness of using checklists of non-prioritised, non-exhaustive factors to decide relocation cases based on the uncertainty such general checklists create for litigants and their children. This inevitably leads to increased litigation and appeals until the litigant finds a judge who will see the facts the litigant’s way. The article seeks to find a more principled way to decide relocation cases that would enable litigants to be given a realistic assessment of their likelihood of success at the outset. The article examines social science research for potential answers, but finds that there is no clear social science basis to support a policy either for or against relocation. The article discusses different theoretical frameworks, and argues that power between parents in relation to relocation should be allocated on the basis of actual responsibility for children. The article ultimately concludes by suggesting a prioritised ‘discipline’ for the values that need to be considered in relocation disputes. This discipline attempts to provide a visible framework for litigants, lawyers and judges to follow, which is designed to enhance consistency and predictability in decision making, and to give real meaning to the welfare principle.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherLexisNexisen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofChild and Family Law Quarterlyen_NZ
dc.subjectRelocationen_NZ
dc.subjectChild's best interestsen_NZ
dc.subjectInternationalen_NZ
dc.subjectChecklistsen_NZ
dc.subjectLikelihood of successen_NZ
dc.titleRelocation Cases – the Rhetoric and the Reality of a Child’s Best Interests – a View from the Bottom of the Worlden_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2018-11-28T23:00:30Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.issue2en_NZ
otago.relation.volume23en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage177en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage155en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record