Reconceptualising the Role of the New Zealand Environment Court
Warnock, Ceri Ailsa
This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.
If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.
Cite this item:
Ceri Warnock “Reconceptualising the Role of the New Zealand Environment Court” (2014) 26(3) Journal of Environmental Law 507- 518, DOI.org/10.1093/jel/equ030.
Permanent link to OUR Archive version:
http://hdl.handle.net/10523/8730
Abstract:
What does the specialised nature of an environment court entitle it to do? The recent decision of the New Zealand Supreme Court in Environmental Defence Society Incorporated v Marlborough District Council (‘the King Salmon case’)[2014] NZSC 38 helps to answer this question. For the past 20 years, the New Zealand Environment Court has decided applications within a framework of the broadly defined statutory purpose of sustainable resource management. The King Salmon case narrows this wide discretion. This article analyses the implications of the decision, suggesting that it helps to delineate between functions of specialist environment courts that may be considered appropriate (adjudicative and legislative fact finding) and decision-making that strays too far into the policy-sphere.
Date:
2014
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Pages:
507-518
Keywords:
Environmental law; Environmental Defence Society Incorporated v Marlborough; Courts and adjudication
Research Type:
Journal Article
Languages:
English
Collections
- Journal Article [919]
- Law Collection [582]