Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWarnock, Ceri Ailsa
dc.date.available2018-12-12T22:55:21Z
dc.date.copyright2006
dc.identifier.citationCeri Warnock “Editorial: Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change – Relevance to Discharge Permit Applications” (2006) 6(16) Resource Management Bulletin 191-193.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8739
dc.description.abstractThe decision of Greenpeace New Zealand v Northland Regional Council considered to what extent, if at all, consent authorities are permitted to take into account climate change factors when considering applications for discharge of greenhouse gases. The author considers this issue in relation to the Mighty River Power case, which concerned an appeal against the authorization of a coal-fired electricity station, with specific regard to the court’s treatment of the Resource Management Act 1991.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherLexisNexisen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofResource Management Bulletinen_NZ
dc.subjectClimate changeen_NZ
dc.subjectResource management lawen_NZ
dc.subjectEnergy lawen_NZ
dc.subjectEnvironmental lawen_NZ
dc.titleGreenhouse Gases and Climate Change: Relevance to Discharge Permit Applicationsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2018-12-12T19:26:13Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.issue16en_NZ
otago.relation.volume6en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage193en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage191en_NZ
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record