Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuru, Jacinta
dc.date.available2019-01-28T03:03:38Z
dc.date.copyright2006
dc.identifier.citationJ Ruru, “What Could Have Been: The Common Law Doctrine of Native Title in Land Under Salt Water in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand” (2006) 32(1) Monash University Law Review 116-144.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8811
dc.description.abstractOnce upon a time, the indigenous peoples of Australia and New Zealand had exclusive occupation and use of their homelands. They did not distinguish between land on dry soil and land under water – it was all considered to be one garden. In recent years, both peoples have attempted to use the courts in their respective countries to reaffirm their connection with this landscape. This article examines the contemporary interpretation of the common law doctrine of native title and its applicability to one part of this space: land under salt water.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherMonash University Law Schoolen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofMonash University Law Reviewen_NZ
dc.subjectProperty lawen_NZ
dc.subjectNative titleen_NZ
dc.subjectIndigenous peopleen_NZ
dc.subjectWater lawen_NZ
dc.subjectCommon lawen_NZ
dc.subjectAustraliaen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.titleWhat Could Have Been: The Common Law Doctrine of Native Title in Land Under Salt Water in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealanden_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-01-28T01:21:26Z
otago.schoolFaculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.issue1en_NZ
otago.relation.volume32en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage144en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage116en_NZ
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record