Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRodriguez Ferrere, Marcelo
dc.date.available2019-01-30T19:55:46Z
dc.date.copyright2017
dc.identifier.citationRodriguez Ferrere, M. B., ‘An impasse in New Zealand administrative law: How did we get here?’(2017) 28 PLR 310.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8814
dc.description.abstractVariable intensity or standards of review is an issue that has long vexed many Commonwealth courts and commentators. New Zealand is no exception, and a rigorous debate about the desirability of a structured approach to variable intensity of review has taken place in that jurisdiction for over a decade. Lacking in this debate, however, is any clear direction or guidance from the Supreme Court of New Zealand, which has remained silent on the issue. This article argues that this silence is a departure from the traditional approach of New Zealand's highest courts being at the vanguard of administrative law developments, and that there was a missed opportunity to contribute to the debate when the High Court decision of Wolf v Minister of Immigration was released in 2004. The inaction from New Zealand's highest courts in the years since risks the issue becoming mired in confusion.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherThomson Reutersen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Law Reviewen_NZ
dc.subjectAdministrative Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectPublic Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectWolf v Minister of Immigrationen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.titleAn Impasse in New Zealand Administrative Law: How did we get here?en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-01-30T02:54:16Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.volume28en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage310en_NZ
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record