Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrance-Hudson, Ben
dc.identifier.citationBen France-Hudson “Surprisingly Social: Private Property and Environmental Management” (2017) 29 Journal of Environmental Law 101 – 127. Doi: 10.1093/jel/eqw032.en_NZ
dc.description.abstractWhile scholars express a range of concerns about the use of private property to manage natural resources, an enduring counter-tradition within our idea of private property provides a principled basis for ameliorating or avoiding these concerns. This counter-tradition, the social obligation norm of property, recognises the intrinsically social function of private property and that private property can impose obligations in addition to conferring entitlements. The New Zealand quota management system for fish and New Zealand Emission Trading Scheme provide illustrations of the presence of this counter-tradition within our law. The counter-tradition also provides a way in which the concerns regarding private property in this space can be addressed, while maintaining the behaviour changing benefits private property offers.en_NZ
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectPrivate propertyen_NZ
dc.subjectEnvironmental lawen_NZ
dc.subjectEnvironmental managementen_NZ
dc.subjectSocial obligation normen_NZ
dc.subjectEmissions tradingen_NZ
dc.subjectQuota managementen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.titleSurprisingly Social: Private Property and Environmental Managementen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record