Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGeddis, Andrew
dc.date.available2019-01-31T03:36:46Z
dc.date.copyright2005
dc.identifier.citationAndrew Geddis, “Parliamentary Privilege: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?”, Public Law 696-706 [2005].en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8840
dc.description.abstractThis article considers the legal issues around absolute privilege addressed in the Privy Council case of Jennings v Buchanan. The author begins by reviewing the basis for the Privy Council’s decision in that case, before exploring the various reasons advanced by the Privileges Committee for why this particular judgment may have been an error. To conclude, the article discusses whether it is desirable for Parliament as an institution to make its own determination of absolute privilege issues, or whether the courts should be charged with the constitutional duty of fully deciding the point.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwellen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectAbsolute privilegeen_NZ
dc.subjectParliamentary privilegeen_NZ
dc.subjectPublic lawen_NZ
dc.titleParliamentary Privilege: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-01-31T01:25:54Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage706en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage696en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record