Parliamentary Government in New Zealand: Lines of Continuity and Moments of Change
Geddis, Andrew
This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.
If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.
Cite this item:
Geddis, A. (2016). Parliamentary government in New Zealand: Lines of continuity and moments of change. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(1), 99-118. doi: 10.1093/icon/mow001.
Permanent link to OUR Archive version:
http://hdl.handle.net/10523/8843
Abstract:
This article addresses one particular feature of New Zealand’s constitution: the continuing combination within a highly centralized system of government of formally unlimited legislative power and strong executive dominance of the activities of the nation’s Parliament. An observer schooled in the orthodoxies of constitutional-design best practice might expect to see some significant problems in terms of how public power in New Zealand is authorized and imposed. However, contrary to such expectations, New Zealand has managed to combine unified and intensive forms of public power with a genuinely free and open society, which has an unbroken history of fairly contested democratic elections and subsequent peaceful transfers of governmental power dating back to the 1850s. This article explores the particularly idiosyncratic nature of New Zealand’s form of parliamentary government, and in particular the effect that the adoption of a mixed-member proportional voting system has had.
Date:
2016
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Pages:
99-118
Keywords:
Constitutional law; Public law; New Zealand
Research Type:
Journal Article
Languages:
English
Collections
- Journal Article [763]
- Law Collection [495]