Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRodriguez Ferrere, Marcelo
dc.date.available2019-01-31T19:58:14Z
dc.date.copyright2012
dc.identifier.citation(2012) Otago L. Rev. 829.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8855
dc.description.abstractThe Supreme Court of New Zealand’s decision in Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Stitching Lodestar is the centrepiece of New Zealand’s complicated and confusing approach to appellate jurisdiction. This paper examines that approach, attempts to identify the reasons why it is confusing and lastly, suggests a potential path for reform and improvement.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherOtago Law Review Trust Boarden_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofOtago Law Reviewen_NZ
dc.subjectAdministrative Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectPublic Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.titleThe Unnecessary Confusion in New Zealand's Appellate Jurisdictionsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-01-31T02:58:27Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage829en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record