dc.contributor.author | Palmer, Jess | |
dc.contributor.author | Geddis, Andrew | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-03T20:00:03Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.citation | University of Queensland Law Journal, 31(2), 287-305, 2012. | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10523/8868 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article examines what the authors consider “the worst decision handed down by New Zealand’s top court in the last quarter-century.” The authors defend their position by arguing that the Vector Gas decision represents a failure of the sort of judicial craft expected of judges sitting on a nation’s highest court, with specific regard to the Supreme Court's duty to act in a way that is helpful to the society over which it acts as a legal guardian. | en_NZ |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_NZ |
dc.publisher | TC Beirne School of Law | en_NZ |
dc.relation.ispartof | University of Queensland Law Journal | en_NZ |
dc.subject | Contract law | en_NZ |
dc.subject | Energy law | en_NZ |
dc.subject | Courts and adjudication | en_NZ |
dc.subject | New Zealand | en_NZ |
dc.title | What Was That Thing You Said? The New Zealand Supreme Court's Vexing Vector Gas Decision | en_NZ |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_NZ |
dc.date.updated | 2019-01-31T20:24:45Z | |
otago.school | University of Otago Faculty of Law | en_NZ |
otago.relation.issue | 2 | en_NZ |
otago.relation.volume | 31 | en_NZ |
otago.bitstream.endpage | 305 | en_NZ |
otago.bitstream.startpage | 287 | en_NZ |
otago.openaccess | Open | en_NZ |