Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Jess
dc.contributor.authorGeddis, Andrew
dc.date.available2019-02-03T20:00:03Z
dc.date.copyright2012
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of Queensland Law Journal, 31(2), 287-305, 2012.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8868
dc.description.abstractThis article examines what the authors consider “the worst decision handed down by New Zealand’s top court in the last quarter-century.” The authors defend their position by arguing that the Vector Gas decision represents a failure of the sort of judicial craft expected of judges sitting on a nation’s highest court, with specific regard to the Supreme Court's duty to act in a way that is helpful to the society over which it acts as a legal guardian.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherTC Beirne School of Lawen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofUniversity of Queensland Law Journalen_NZ
dc.subjectContract lawen_NZ
dc.subjectEnergy lawen_NZ
dc.subjectCourts and adjudicationen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.titleWhat Was That Thing You Said? The New Zealand Supreme Court's Vexing Vector Gas Decisionen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-01-31T20:24:45Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.issue2en_NZ
otago.relation.volume31en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage305en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage287en_NZ
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record