Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrance-Hudson, Ben
dc.date.available2019-02-03T20:22:15Z
dc.date.copyright2016
dc.identifier.citationBen France-Hudson “The Kermadec/Rangitāhua Ocean Sanctuary: Expropriation Free but a Breach of Good Faith” [2016] Resource Management Theory and Practice 55 - 81.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8890
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the legal claims at the heart of the dispute surrounding the proposal that New Zealand create an ocean sanctuary surrounding the Kermadec/Rangitāhua Islands. While the author concludes that there is little merit in the claim that the creation of the sanctuary will result in an illegitimate expropriation of the private property inherent in the individual transferable quota conferred by the Fisheries Act 1996 (NZ), the claim that the Crown breached its duty of good faith to Māori under the Treaty of Waitangi is both strong and depressingly familiar.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherResource Management Law Associationen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofResource Management Theory and Practiceen_NZ
dc.subjectConservationen_NZ
dc.subjectEnvironmental Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectProperty Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectMaorien_NZ
dc.subjectTreaty of Waitangien_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.titleThe Kermadec/Rangitāhua Ocean Sanctuary: Expropriation Free but a Breach of Good Faithen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-01-31T22:34:17Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage81en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage55en_NZ
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record