Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorScott, Struan
dc.date.available2019-02-04T20:01:39Z
dc.date.copyright2006
dc.identifier.citationStruan Scott, Mistaken Bank Payments: Commercial Certainty Counts. The Otago Law Review 11(2): 209-232 (2006).en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8902
dc.description.abstractThis article critically analyses a leading English case on mistaken payments — Barclays Bank v Simms [1980] QB 677 — and the subsequent application of its reasoning to mistaken bank payments involving three parties (a customer, paying bank, and recipient). The article examines factors that account for the acceptance Simms has received and identifies factors that distinguish three party cases from two party cases (involving a payer and a recipient). Building upon its analysis of other leading UK cases and the US position, it advances a new theoretical approach for three party cases.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherOtago Law Review Trust Boarden_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofThe Otago Law Reviewen_NZ
dc.subjectBarclays Bank v Simmsen_NZ
dc.subjectBanking Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectFinance Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectEnglanden_NZ
dc.subjectUSen_NZ
dc.titleMistaken Bank Payments: Commercial Certainty Countsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-02-04T00:20:35Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.issue2en_NZ
otago.relation.volume11en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage232en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage209en_NZ
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record