Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorScott, Struan
dc.date.available2019-02-04T20:02:34Z
dc.date.copyright2012
dc.identifier.citationStruan Scott, Mistaken Payments and the Change of Position Defence: Rare Cases and Elegance. The Otago Law Review 12(4): 645 – 662 (2012).en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8904
dc.description.abstractThis article critically analyses two New Zealand Court of Appeal decisions involving a change of position defence created by s 94B of the Judicature Act 1908 and the common law change of position defence. Aspects of the reasoning in these cases are controversial (both within New Zealand and internationally). The article critically examines these cases and, after developing a comparison with the change of position defence as developed by the American Law Institute, suggests how these cases give a new insight into the operation of this defence.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherOtago Law Review Trust Boarden_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofThe Otago Law Reviewen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.subjectCourt of Appealen_NZ
dc.subjectCommon Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectChange of Position Defenceen_NZ
dc.subjectUnjust Enrichmenten_NZ
dc.subjectRemediesen_NZ
dc.titleMistaken Payments and the Change of Position Defence: Rare Cases and Eleganceen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-02-04T00:25:47Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.issue4en_NZ
otago.relation.volume12en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage662en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage645en_NZ
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record