Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHook, Maria
dc.date.available2019-02-10T20:53:02Z
dc.date.copyright2014
dc.identifier.citation(2014) 63 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 963-975.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8937
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the effect of choice of law agreements on the courts’ exercise of jurisdiction. In particular, it considers whether English courts ought to exercise jurisdiction to uphold choice of law agreements that would otherwise be defeated in a competing forum. Two reasons have been advanced in support of this approach: that courts should prioritise the choice of law rules of the forum; and that the parties should be held to their agreement on the applicable law. This article argues that neither of these reasons is justifiable in principle.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofInternational & Comparative Law Quarterlyen_NZ
dc.subjectChoice of Law Agreementen_NZ
dc.subjectClose Connectionen_NZ
dc.subjectForum Conveniensen_NZ
dc.subjectGoverning Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectJurisdictionen_NZ
dc.subjectParty Autonomyen_NZ
dc.titleThe Choice of Law Agreement as a Reason for Exercising Jurisdictionen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-02-10T20:47:58Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.volume63en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage975en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage963en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record