Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuru, Jacinta
dc.date.available2019-02-10T21:06:17Z
dc.date.copyright2008
dc.identifier.citationJ Ruru, “Finding Solutions for the Legislative Gaps in Determining Rights to the Family Home on Colonially Defined Indigenous Lands” (2008) 41(2) U.B.C. Law Review 315-348.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/8948
dc.description.abstractThis article queries: what happens to the family home if the owner dies or the couple separate when it has been built on, in Canada, Indian reserve land, or in NZ on Māori freehold land? This is a critical issue where the general law of a 50/50 split does not apply to Indigenous tenure land. The author explores the Canadian proposed legislation and illustrate the need for NZ to develop its own legal answers.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherUniversity of British Columbia Law Schoolen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofU.B.C. Law Reviewen_NZ
dc.subjectProperty Lawen_NZ
dc.subjectIndigenous Peoplesen_NZ
dc.subjectCanadaen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.titleFinding Solutions for the Legislative Gaps in Determining Rights to the Family Home on Colonially Defined Indigenous Landsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-02-07T20:55:25Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.issue2en_NZ
otago.relation.volume41en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage348en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage315en_NZ
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record