Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGavaghan, Colin
dc.date.available2019-03-08T01:21:35Z
dc.date.copyright2016
dc.identifier.citation“Stopping suicide after Seales.” New Zealand Criminal Law Review (2016); 1: 4-18.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/9049
dc.description.abstractSuicide occupies an anomalous position in New Zealand law. Although it is not a crime to attempt suicide, the provision of assistance in such an attempt remains an offence. Furthermore, s 41 of the Crimes Act allows for the use of force to prevent another’s suicide. The case brought by Lecretia Seales in 2015 focused on the legal status of assisting suicide. During the course of those proceedings, however, attention turned to the defence under s 41. In this article, I consider the approach taken in Seales towards that provision. I will argue that the wide scope accorded to that defence by Collins J. is not the only manner in which that section could be interpreted, and argue in favour of an alternative, more restricted, interpretation.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherAuckland University of Technologyen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofNew Zealand Criminal Law Reviewen_NZ
dc.subjectSuicideen_NZ
dc.subjectEuthanasiaen_NZ
dc.subjectLecretia Sealesen_NZ
dc.subjectCriminal lawen_NZ
dc.titleStopping Suicide After Sealesen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-03-07T22:32:45Z
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago Faculty of Lawen_NZ
otago.relation.issue1en_NZ
otago.bitstream.endpage18en_NZ
otago.bitstream.startpage4en_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record