Inventing the Laws of Gravity: The ICC's Initial Lubanga Decision and Its Regressive Consequences
Smith, Stephen
This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.
If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.
Cite this item:
Smith, SE (2008). Inventing the laws of gravity: The ICC’s initial Lubanga decision and its regressive consequences. International Criminal Law Review, 8:331–352. doi: 10.1163/156753608X265321.
Permanent link to OUR Archive version:
http://hdl.handle.net/10523/9051
Abstract:
It now appears likely that Thomas Lubanga Dyilo will be the first person tried before the International Criminal Court. In 2006, the Pre-Trial Chamber of the ICC authorized the issuance of a warrant of arrest for Lubanga, the leader of a military organization in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In so doing, the Pre-Trial Chamber examined the ICC Statute’s admissibility requirements for cases and held that only cases that meet a prescribed standard of “aggravated gravity” are admissible before the Court. In this article, the author argues that the Pre-Trial Chamber’s Lubanga decision will have several long-term negative consequences on the ability of the ICC to fulfill its mandate. As a direct result of the Chamber’s decision on gravity, the ICC will be unable to replicate many of the successes and advances made in international justice by the International Criminal Tribunals in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda.
Date:
2008
Publisher:
Brill
Pages:
331-352
Keywords:
International Criminal Court; Admissibility; Gravity; Most Senior Leaders; Lubanga
Research Type:
Journal Article
Languages:
English
Collections
- Journal Article [918]
- Law Collection [582]