Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMachado, Liana
dc.contributor.advisorAbraham, Wickliffe
dc.contributor.authorHurley, Roanne Hazel
dc.date.available2019-03-22T02:40:21Z
dc.date.copyright2019
dc.identifier.citationHurley, R. H. (2019). Using TDCS to improve working memory: can metaplasticity protocols boost benefits? (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). University of Otago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/9138en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/9138
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive electrical brain stimulation technique that has been used extensively over prefrontal cortex in an effort to enhance verbal working memory (WM). However, inconsistent and contradictory outcomes from similar stimulation protocols have created a strong need to examine methodologies in greater detail. This review undertook an in-depth look at both positive and negative prefrontal tDCS-WM findings in adult populations to shed light on methodological parameters that may be driving the inconsistent outcomes in the literature. Method: To facilitate comprehension of the protocols employed in each study and aid between-study comparisons, we illustrated study design alongside key findings. To aid clinical translation, we reviewed separately by population (healthy young adults versus WM impaired) performance changes during stimulation (online) versus following stimulation (offline), which offers more therapeutic promise. Results: Our dissection of the literature highlighted design factors that are likely adding unnecessary noise and obscuring outcomes. We uncovered a blind spot in the literature relating to cognitive factors, including influential characteristics pertaining to the details of the WM test used to assess tDCS effects and participant characteristics that influence WM abilities and the organisation of WM in the brain, which may impact the efficacy of tDCS-WM protocols through complex interactions. Conclusions: By attending to both cognitive- and tDCS-related factors in the design phase of the study, future researchers can reduce unintended variation that may obscure positive outcomes or lead to spurious results, thereby advancing the field forward toward developing more effective tDCS-WM protocols.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherUniversity of Otago
dc.rightsAll items in OUR Archive are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subjectTranscranial Direct Current Stimulationen_NZ
dc.subjectWorking Memoryen_NZ
dc.subjectMetaplasticityen_NZ
dc.titleUsing TDCS to improve working memory: can metaplasticity protocols boost benefits?en_NZ
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.updated2019-03-22T00:35:49Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychologyen_NZ
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen_NZ
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Otago
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
otago.interloannoen_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Onlyen_NZ
otago.evidence.presentYes
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record