|dc.description.abstract||In today's open, distributed environments, there is an increasing need for systems to assist the interoperation of tools and information resources. This paper describes a multi-agent system, DALEKS, that supports such activities for the information processing domain. With this system, information processing tasks are accomplished by the use of an agent architecture incorporating task planning and information agent matchmaking components. We discuss the characteristics of planning in this domain and describe how information processing tools are specified for the planner. We also describe the manner in which planning, agent matchmaking, and information task execution are interleaved in the DALEKS system. An example application taken from the domain of university course administration is provided to illustrate some of the activities performed in this system.||en_NZ
|dc.description.references||[Ambros-Ingerson and Steel, 1988] J. Ambros-Ingerson and S. Steel. Integrating planning, execution and monitoring. In Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-88), pages 735–740, 1988.
[Cranefield and Purvis, 1995] S. J. S. Cranefield and M. K. Purvis. Agent-based integration of general-purpose tools. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Information Agents, Fourth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, December 1995.
[Cranefield and Purvis, 1996] S. J. S. Cranefield and M. K. Purvis. An agent-based architecture for software tool coordination. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Theoretical and Practical Foundations of Intelligent Agents, Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1996. (to appear in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intellence, Springer, 1997).
[Erol et al., 1994] K. Erol, J. Hendler, and D. S. Nau. UMCP: A sound and complete procedure for hierarchical task-network planning. In K. Hammond, editor, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on AI Planning Systems, pages 249–254, 1994.
[Genesereth and Ketchpel, 1994] M. R. Genesereth and S. P. Ketchpel. Software agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7):48–53, July 1994.
[Golden et al., 1994] K. Golden, O. Etzioni, and D. Weld. Omnipotence without omniscience: Efficient sensor management for planning. In Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), pages 1048–1054, 1994.
[Knoblock, 1995] C. A. Knoblock. Planning, executing, sensing, and replanning for information gathering. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 2, pages 1686–1693, 1995.
[Kuokka and Harada, 1995] D. Kuokka and L. Harada. Matchmaking for information agents. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 1, pages 672–678, 1995.
[Kwok and Weld, 1996] C. Kwok and D. Weld. Planning to gather information. In Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96), 1996.
[LANL-ACL, 1995] Uniform Resource Characteristics Web page, Advanced Computing Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory. http://www.acl.lanl.gov/URC/, November 1995.
[Williamson et al., 1996] M. Williamson, K. Decker, and K. Sycara. Unified information and control flow in hierarchical task networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI-96 Workshop on Theories of Planning, Action, and Control, 1996.||en_NZ