Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHart, Simon
dc.identifier.citationHart, S. (2018). The Library Assessment Capability Maturity Model: A Means of Optimizing How Libraries Measure Effectiveness. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 13(4). doi:10.18438/eblip29471en
dc.description.abstractObjective – This paper presents a Library Assessment Capability Maturity Model (LACMM) that can assist library managers to improve assessment. The process of developing the LACMM is detailed to provide an evidence trail to foster confidence in its utility and value. Methods – The LACMM was developed during a series of library benchmarking activities across an international network of universities. The utility and value of the LACMM was tested by the benchmarking libraries and other practitioners; feedback from this testing was applied to improve it. Guidance was taken from a procedures model for developing maturity models that draws on design science research methodology where an iterative and reflective approach is taken. Results – The activities decision making junctures and the LACMM as an artifact make up the results of this research. The LACMM has five levels. Each level represents a measure of the effectiveness of any assessment process or program, from ad-hoc processes to mature and continuously improving processes. At each level there are criteria and characteristics that need to be fulfilled in order to reach a particular maturity level. Corresponding to each level of maturity, four stages of the assessment cycle were identified as further elements of the LACMM template. These included (1) Objectives, (2) Methods and data collection, (3) Analysis and interpretation, and (4) Use of results. Several attempts were needed to determine the criteria for each maturity level corresponding to the stages of the assessment cycle. Three versions of the LACMM were developed to introduce managers to using it. Each version corresponded to a different kind of assessment activity: data, discussion, and comparison. A generic version was developed for those who have become more familiar with using it. Through a process of review, capability maturity levels can be identified for each stage in the assessment cycle; so too can plans to improve processes toward continuous improvement. Conclusion – The LACMM will add to the plethora of resources already available. However, it is hoped that the simplicity of the tool as a means of assessing assessment and identifying an improvement path will be its strength. It can act as a quick aide-mémoire or form the basis of a comprehensive self-review or an inter-institutional benchmarking project. It is expected that the tool will be adapted and improved upon as library managers apply it.en_NZ
dc.publisherUniversity of Alberta Librariesen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofEvidence Based Library and Information Practiceen_NZ
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.subjectAcademic Librariesen_NZ
dc.subjectMatariki Network of Universities.en_NZ
dc.subjectLibrary assessmenten_NZ
dc.titleThe Library Assessment Capability Maturity Model: A Means of Optimizing How Libraries Measure Effectivenessen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International