Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNicholls, Scott
dc.contributor.authorHart, Simon
dc.contributor.authorAmos, Howard
dc.contributor.authorBenn, Jill
dc.date.available2019-09-23T21:00:28Z
dc.date.copyright2019
dc.identifier.citationNicholls, S., Hart, S., Amos, H., & Benn, J. (2019). Adding up the Flipped Subscription Model. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual IATUL Conference. Presented at the 40th Annual IATUL Conference, Purdue University Press.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/9627
dc.description.abstractOne of the common pathways proposed to achieving a global open access scholarly publishing model is the “flipped” approach. In this scenario, journal publishers “flip” their pricing model from subscription to gold open access (gold OA) and library budgets are redirected from supporting subscriptions to Article Publishing Costs (APCs) associated with gold OA. Initiatives such as OA2020, and more recently Plan S, have to varying degrees advocated for this approach. Underlying the flipped model is the assumption there is enough money in the global academic library subscription system to cover the costs of a scholarly publishing model based on APCs. A number of studies have tested this assumption including the Mellon Foundation Pay It Forward report which focused on large, research intensive universities in North America and the Max Planck Digital Library Open Access Policy white paper which used global market reports and publishing figures to derive their calculations. However, is this assumption valid for other sized universities or using different analytical approaches? In 2018, the Matariki Network of Universities (an international collaborative venture of seven medium sized universities) used its unique partnership to test this assumption for medium-sized universities using shared subscription and publishing data. The project had two specific objectives. Firstly, to determine if the amount of money paid by Matariki institutions for journal subscriptions both individually and collectively is enough to cover APC costs of a flipped model. Secondly, to determine what the average APC cost would need to be if each Matariki institution only had their subscription budget to cover gold OA publishing. This paper describes the approach taken in the study and outlines the findings in comparison to other studies. It will also discuss the implications of the results in the context of current initiatives supporting a flipped model.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherPurdue University Pressen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 40th Annual IATUL conferenceen_NZ
dc.relation.urihttps://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2019/value/7/en_NZ
dc.relation.urihttps://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2019/value/7/en_NZ
dc.subjectAcademic Librariesen_NZ
dc.subjectMatariki Network of Universities.en_NZ
dc.subjectOpen accessen_NZ
dc.subjectJournal subscriptionsen_NZ
dc.subjectArtilce processing chargesen_NZ
dc.titleAdding up the Flipped Subscription Modelen_NZ
dc.typeConference or Workshop Item (Paper published in proceedings)en_NZ
dc.date.updated2019-09-22T21:03:11Z
otago.schoolLibraryen_NZ
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
otago.event.title40th Annual IATUL Conferenceen_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record